I’ve been having some great new experiences lately, but somehow that hasn’t prevented me from being a bit on the cranky side. I don’t like being cranky and I certainly don’t ever intentionally share it when I am. So I’m consciously working through my cranky to get out the other side.
This morning as it rains, fingers crossed for my friends who are still bailing out from the round last week, I decided to look at things a different way instead of questioning why I’m crabby. (By the way, whoever forgot to turn off their request for rain when we were in drought last year can turn it off now.) Sometimes it is better to accept a thing that is, but to adjust to give it less of a priority.
So I’m inching around, looking for a sunnier view of things and while I am at it I remembered a conversation that I had with an employee a few years ago. She had to send an email out to resolve an issue and she asked me to read it first because it had the potential to be sensitive. I suggested that she reframe her whole premise in a more positive light and rearrange her facts to reduce the emphasis on a couple of problematic ones. She told me that she felt that was dishonest. While admiring her straightforwardness, I was a bit taken aback at her use of such a strong word in a conversation with a boss. (I know bosses who would have considered her insubordinate, I disagree.)
Perhaps my suggestions smacked of being disingenuous. (Check out the differences in meanings if you are at all unsure.) I told her as much – but followed up by asking her intent. Was she determined to be straightforward and walk into a sensitivity bramble, or did she want to resolve the original issue? My suggestion would achieve the latter more easily than hers.
One person’s weeds are another’s wild flowers – except for dandelions, even for the folks that like them on their salads. (You really shouldn’t eat the ones growing in yards.) Principles are highly necessary, but shouldn’t always be held in a short view. Sometimes we should walk around the principle and even take a few steps back to see it from different angles and distances. I too am a straightforward person, but I can couch my communications in a manner that will best convey my intent without compromising my straightforward tendencies.
In this world where we seem to honor confrontation over many more worthy traits, wouldn’t it be a nice change of pace if we took that walk around our ire (principle) and thought about what we intend to gain before we act on it? I promise I will closely monitor if my cranky is the driving motivator for my actions and words in the days to come until it loosens its hold on me.
© 2013 Practical Business | Reasonable Expectations